Choosing the right tenders is the first strategic decision an architecture firm makes. Gilliatt automates this monitoring so you spend your time responding, not searching.
Conventional methods quickly hit a wall when faced with the daily volume of public procurement data.
Receiving a list of notices just tells you they exist. Reading each one, identifying the programme, assessing the budget and scope of work: that's still you, doing it manually, for every single result.
Most firms only look at their domestic market. TED publishes quality tenders from Belgium, Switzerland and Luxembourg every week. Less competitive, and systematically overlooked.
Public tenders are filled in by contracting authorities. Miscoded CPV categories, vague titles, missing amounts: a standard filter only sees what was entered correctly. Gilliatt reads the actual content of each notice, not just its metadata.
TED (Tenders Electronic Daily) is the supplement to the EU Official Journal. It is the official database where all European public contracts above regulatory thresholds must be published.
Coverage spans France, Belgium, Switzerland and Luxembourg simultaneously (and the rest of Europe).
The algorithm opens every notice and reads the full details of each tender on your behalf, with no action required on your end.
A daily process. Silent and razor-sharp.
The system queries TED and opens every notice in full, one by one, with no blunt filtering, nothing missed.
The AI reads each notice, extracts location, budget and programme, and assigns GO or NO GO based on your criteria.
The newsletter lands. Best opportunities at the top, detailed GOs below. Nothing left to search for.
Designed to be read in seconds. Everything that matters is right there.
No more navigating complex procurement platforms. One click is all it takes.
Rejected tenders (NO GO) are also shown further down the email. A quick human double-check to make sure nothing relevant was missed.
1. ZAC Fosse au Bailly — Chambly
Why: Major urban development >€15M, strong contractual potential.
2. Accord‑cadre MOE — Château de Versailles
Why: International prestige, heritage rehabilitation, high visibility.
3. Raamovereenkomst Jan Yperman Ziekenhuis — Belgium
Why: Recurring hospital projects, renewable framework contract.
Public space development across ~30 ha (roads, roundabout, green corridor, housing districts, mixed-use and facility zones). Full urban/landscape design management: design phases (APS/APD/PRO), environmental monitoring, specifications drafting, execution management and OPC.
Rehabilitation and development of buildings and grounds (conservation, museography, accessibility). Design management: architectural design, regulatory studies, procurement documents and execution oversight for complex heritage operations.
Programme: full renovation of several campus buildings, targeted demolitions and redesign of outdoor spaces.
Architectural design management for masterplan development, design and oversight of hospital operations (renovations, extensions). Scope: preliminary design, planning, procurement documents, site supervision.
One identified opportunity pays for months of subscription.